回看生成DefaultAopProxyFactory的createAopProxy方法来生成代理类
public class DefaultAopProxyFactory implements AopProxyFactory, Serializable {
@Override
public AopProxy createAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException {
if (!NativeDetector.inNativeImage() &&
(config.isOptimize() || config.isProxyTargetClass() || hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces(config))) {
Class<?> targetClass = config.getTargetClass();
if (targetClass == null) {
throw new AopConfigException("TargetSource cannot determine target class: " +
"Either an interface or a target is required for proxy creation.");
}
if (targetClass.isInterface() || Proxy.isProxyClass(targetClass)) {
//采用JdkDynamicAopProxy生成jdk动态代理对象
return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config);
}
//采用ObjenesisCglibAopProxy生成cglib动态代理对象
return new ObjenesisCglibAopProxy(config);
}
else {
return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config);
}
}
/**
* Determine whether the supplied {@link AdvisedSupport} has only the
* {@link org.springframework.aop.SpringProxy} interface specified
* (or no proxy interfaces specified at all).
*/
private boolean hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces(AdvisedSupport config) {
Class<?>[] ifcs = config.getProxiedInterfaces();
return (ifcs.length == 0 || (ifcs.length == 1 && SpringProxy.class.isAssignableFrom(ifcs[0])));
}
}
Spring所有的代理AopProxy的创建最后都是ProxyCreatorSupport#createAopProxy这个方法
protected final synchronized AopProxy createAopProxy() {
if (!this.active) {
activate();
}
//getAopProxyFactory拿到的就是DefaultAopProxyFactory
//createAopProxy调用的就是DefaultAopProxyFactory类里面的方法
return getAopProxyFactory().createAopProxy(this);
}
显然它又是调用了AopProxyFactory#createAopProxy方法,它的唯一实现为DefaultAopProxyFactory。
它做了一个简单的逻辑判断:若实现类接口,使用JdkDynamicAopProxy最终去创建,否则交给ObjenesisCglibAopProxy。
最终拿到AopProxy后,调用AopProxy#getProxy()就会拿到这个代理对象,从而进行相应的工作了。
我们基本有一共共识就是:默认情况下,若我们实现了接口,就实用JDK动态代理,若没有就实用CGLIB。那么就下来,就具体看看关乎到代理对象的创建、执行的一个具体过程原理
AOP(Aspect Orient Programming),一般称为面向切面编程,作为面向对象的一种补充,用于处理系统中分布于各个模块的横切关注点,比如事务管理、日志、缓存等等。
AOP代理主要分为静态代理和动态代理,静态代理的代表为AspectJ;而动态代理则以Spring AOP为代表。静态代理是编译期实现,动态代理是运行期实现,可想而知前者拥有更好的性能。
静态代理:
静态代理是编译阶段生成AOP代理类,也就是说生成的字节码就织入了增强后的AOP对象;(并不会创建出多余的对象)
实现方式:
基于AspectJ的静态代理方式非常强大,但是它依赖于它自己的编译器。并且还有自己的个性化语言,使用起来不够方便,因此其实还是使用得较少的。主要还是以动态代理为主~~~
动态代理:
动态代理则不会修改字节码,而是在内存中临时生成一个AOP对象,这个AOP对象包含了目标对象的全部方法,并且在特定的切点做了增强处理,并回调原对象的方法
这在我们平时使用中得到了大量的使用,因为使用简单并且还非常灵活,下面就重点介绍。
它是一个AOP代理的抽象接口。提供了两个方法,让我们可以获取对应 配置的AOP对象的代理:
public interface AopProxy {
//Create a new proxy object. Uses the AopProxy's default class loader ClassUtils.getDefaultClassLoader()
Object getProxy();
Object getProxy(@Nullable ClassLoader classLoader);
}
它的继承关系也很简单,就是接下来我们要说的那几个
final class JdkDynamicAopProxy implements AopProxy, InvocationHandler, Serializable {
/** use serialVersionUID from Spring 1.2 for interoperability. */
private static final long serialVersionUID = 5531744639992436476L;
/** We use a static Log to avoid serialization issues. */
private static final Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(JdkDynamicAopProxy.class);
/**当前代理对象相关配置信息保存 **/
private final AdvisedSupport advised;
//当前代理对象需要代理的接口
private final Class<?>[] proxiedInterfaces;
/**
* Is the {@link #equals} method defined on the proxied interfaces?
*/
private boolean equalsDefined;
/**
* Is the {@link #hashCode} method defined on the proxied interfaces?
*/
private boolean hashCodeDefined;
public JdkDynamicAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException {
Assert.notNull(config, "AdvisedSupport must not be null");
if (config.getAdvisorCount() == 0 && config.getTargetSource() == AdvisedSupport.EMPTY_TARGET_SOURCE) {
throw new AopConfigException("No advisors and no TargetSource specified");
}
this.advised = config;
//completeProxiedInterfaces方法会获得当前类需要代理的接口
//并且额外还会让代理对象实现两个接口,但是因为第二个参数为true
//因此一共会让代理对象再额外实现三个接口:SpringProxy,Advised和DecoratingProxy
this.proxiedInterfaces = AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised, true);
findDefinedEqualsAndHashCodeMethods(this.proxiedInterfaces);
}
@Override
public Object getProxy() {
return getProxy(ClassUtils.getDefaultClassLoader());
}
@Override
public Object getProxy(@Nullable ClassLoader classLoader) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Creating JDK dynamic proxy: " + this.advised.getTargetSource());
}
//获得代理对象的方法十分的简单,就是最原始的jdk生成动态代理的方法
//但是此时传入的拦截器方法为当前类,因为其实现了InvocationHandler接口
return Proxy.newProxyInstance(classLoader, this.proxiedInterfaces, this);
}
/**
* Finds any {@link #equals} or {@link #hashCode} method that may be defined
* on the supplied set of interfaces.
* @param proxiedInterfaces the interfaces to introspect
*/
private void findDefinedEqualsAndHashCodeMethods(Class<?>[] proxiedInterfaces) {
for (Class<?> proxiedInterface : proxiedInterfaces) {
Method[] methods = proxiedInterface.getDeclaredMethods();
for (Method method : methods) {
if (AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) {
this.equalsDefined = true;
}
if (AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) {
this.hashCodeDefined = true;
}
if (this.equalsDefined && this.hashCodeDefined) {
return;
}
}
}
}
/**
调用链的执行
*/
@Override
@Nullable
public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
Object oldProxy = null;
boolean setProxyContext = false;
//拿到包装了目标对象的TargetSource
TargetSource targetSource = this.advised.targetSource;
Object target = null;
try {
//“通常情况”Spring AOP不会对equals、hashCode方法进行拦截增强,所以此处做了处理
// equalsDefined为false(表示自己没有定义过equals方法) 那就交给代理去比较
// hashCode同理,只要你自己没有实现过此方法,那就交给代理吧
// 需要注意的是:这里统一指的是,如果接口上有此方法,但是你自己并没有实现equals和hashCode方法,那就走AOP这里的实现
// 如国接口上没有定义此方法,只是实现类里自己@Override了HashCode,那是无效的,就是普通执行吧
if (!this.equalsDefined && AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) {
// The target does not implement the equals(Object) method itself.
return equals(args[0]);
}
else if (!this.hashCodeDefined && AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) {
// The target does not implement the hashCode() method itself.
return hashCode();
}
//如果当前方法属于DecoratingProxy接口中getDecoratedClass方法
else if (method.getDeclaringClass() == DecoratingProxy.class) {
// There is only getDecoratedClass() declared -> dispatch to proxy config.
//那么直接通过分析代理配置信息返回目标对象的类型
return AopProxyUtils.ultimateTargetClass(this.advised);
}
//opaque默认为false,表示代理对象会继承Advised接口
else if (!this.advised.opaque &&
//当前方法属于某个接口中的方法
method.getDeclaringClass().isInterface() &&
//当前接口是Advised或者其子类
method.getDeclaringClass().isAssignableFrom(Advised.class)) {
// Service invocations on ProxyConfig with the proxy config...
//那么当前用户是想将代理对象强制转换为advised接口后,调用该接口中某个方法
//那么这里转而调用内部维护的代理类配置信息的method方法
return AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(this.advised, method, args);
}
Object retVal;
//是否暴露代理对象,默认false可配置为true,如果暴露就意味着允许在线程内共享代理对象,
//注意这是在线程内,也就是说同一线程的任意地方都能通过AopContext获取该代理对象,这应该算是比较高级一点的用法了。
// 这里缓存一份代理对象在oldProxy里~~~后面有用
if (this.advised.exposeProxy) {
// Make invocation available if necessary.
//设置代理对象到当前线程
oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
setProxyContext = true;
}
// Get as late as possible to minimize the time we "own" the target,
// in case it comes from a pool.
//拿到目标对象
target = targetSource.getTarget();
Class<?> targetClass = (target != null ? target.getClass() : null);
// Get the interception chain for this method.
//对代理类配置信息中的Advisors集合进行筛选,找出可以应用到当前类和当前类的method方法上的增强器
//然后把这些增强器适配为methodInterceptor后加入集合中统一返回
List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass);
// Check whether we have any advice. If we don't, we can fallback on direct
// reflective invocation of the target, and avoid creating a MethodInvocation.
//当前方法没有适合的拦截器链生成,那么直接反射执行方法即可
if (chain.isEmpty()) {
// We can skip creating a MethodInvocation: just invoke the target directly
// Note that the final invoker must be an InvokerInterceptor so we know it does
// nothing but a reflective operation on the target, and no hot swapping or fancy proxying.
Object[] argsToUse = AopProxyUtils.adaptArgumentsIfNecessary(method, args);
retVal = AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(target, method, argsToUse);
}
else {
//当前方法有相关联的拦截器链集合
// We need to create a method invocation...
//构造拦截器链
MethodInvocation invocation =
new ReflectiveMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain);
// Proceed to the joinpoint through the interceptor chain.
//拦截器链开始执行
//ReflectiveMethodInvocation的proceed方法,不清楚的可以翻看我之前的文章
//该方法最后返回方法的执行结果
retVal = invocation.proceed();
}
// Massage return value if necessary.
//获取方法的返回值
Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType();
if (retVal != null && retVal == target &&
returnType != Object.class && returnType.isInstance(proxy) &&
!RawTargetAccess.class.isAssignableFrom(method.getDeclaringClass())) {
// Special case: it returned "this" and the return type of the method
// is type-compatible. Note that we can't help if the target sets
// a reference to itself in another returned object.
retVal = proxy;
}
//如果方法实际返回值不为null,但是获得的返回结果为null,那么抛出异常
else if (retVal == null && returnType != Void.TYPE && returnType.isPrimitive()) {
throw new AopInvocationException(
"Null return value from advice does not match primitive return type for: " + method);
}
return retVal;
}
finally {
if (target != null && !targetSource.isStatic()) {
// Must have come from TargetSource.
//使用targetSource绑定的target对象,这样一来,targetSource可以完成重用111
targetSource.releaseTarget(target);
}
if (setProxyContext) {
// 把老的代理对象重新set进去~~~
AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy);
}
}
}
/**
* Equality means interfaces, advisors and TargetSource are equal.
* <p>The compared object may be a JdkDynamicAopProxy instance itself
* or a dynamic proxy wrapping a JdkDynamicAopProxy instance.
*/
@Override
public boolean equals(@Nullable Object other) {
if (other == this) {
return true;
}
if (other == null) {
return false;
}
JdkDynamicAopProxy otherProxy;
if (other instanceof JdkDynamicAopProxy) {
otherProxy = (JdkDynamicAopProxy) other;
}
else if (Proxy.isProxyClass(other.getClass())) {
InvocationHandler ih = Proxy.getInvocationHandler(other);
if (!(ih instanceof JdkDynamicAopProxy)) {
return false;
}
otherProxy = (JdkDynamicAopProxy) ih;
}
else {
// Not a valid comparison...
return false;
}
// If we get here, otherProxy is the other AopProxy.
return AopProxyUtils.equalsInProxy(this.advised, otherProxy.advised);
}
/**
* Proxy uses the hash code of the TargetSource.
*/
@Override
public int hashCode() {
return JdkDynamicAopProxy.class.hashCode() * 13 + this.advised.getTargetSource().hashCode();
}
}
该类的设计思路和我们平时自己使用jdk动态代理思路一致,大致有以下几步:
对jdk动态代理底层原理不清楚的,建议看一下本文
还有一点需要注意,就是代理类会额外实现SpringProxy,Advised和DecoratingProxy三个接口,代码体现在下面这行:
this.proxiedInterfaces = AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised, true);
要想搞懂CglibAopProxy的组织思路,callbackFilter必须要了解,建议大家先看一下:
@SuppressWarnings("serial")
class CglibAopProxy implements AopProxy, Serializable {
// Constants for CGLIB callback array indices
//这里的序号用于callBackFilter中,选择某个方法交给某个callback时,会用到
private static final int AOP_PROXY = 0;
private static final int INVOKE_TARGET = 1;
private static final int NO_OVERRIDE = 2;
private static final int DISPATCH_TARGET = 3;
private static final int DISPATCH_ADVISED = 4;
private static final int INVOKE_EQUALS = 5;
private static final int INVOKE_HASHCODE = 6;
/** Logger available to subclasses; static to optimize serialization. */
protected static final Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(CglibAopProxy.class);
/** Keeps track of the Classes that we have validated for final methods. */
//对已经校验过的类进行缓存处理
private static final Map<Class<?>, Boolean> validatedClasses = new WeakHashMap<>();
/** 代理配置类信息 **/
protected final AdvisedSupport advised;
//因为是采用继承方式实现的代理,因此需要考虑父类的构造函数
@Nullable
protected Object[] constructorArgs;
//构造函数参类型
@Nullable
protected Class<?>[] constructorArgTypes;
/** 简单包装了一下AdvisedSupport */
private final transient AdvisedDispatcher advisedDispatcher;
private transient Map<Method, Integer> fixedInterceptorMap = Collections.emptyMap();
private transient int fixedInterceptorOffset;
public CglibAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException {
Assert.notNull(config, "AdvisedSupport must not be null");
if (config.getAdvisorCount() == 0 && config.getTargetSource() == AdvisedSupport.EMPTY_TARGET_SOURCE) {
throw new AopConfigException("No advisors and no TargetSource specified");
}
this.advised = config;
this.advisedDispatcher = new AdvisedDispatcher(this.advised);
}
//设置构造函数相关信息
public void setConstructorArguments(@Nullable Object[] constructorArgs, @Nullable Class<?>[] constructorArgTypes) {
if (constructorArgs == null || constructorArgTypes == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Both 'constructorArgs' and 'constructorArgTypes' need to be specified");
}
if (constructorArgs.length != constructorArgTypes.length) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Number of 'constructorArgs' (" + constructorArgs.length +
") must match number of 'constructorArgTypes' (" + constructorArgTypes.length + ")");
}
this.constructorArgs = constructorArgs;
this.constructorArgTypes = constructorArgTypes;
}
@Override
public Object getProxy() {
return getProxy(null);
}
//获取代理对象,重点方法重点讲解***
@Override
public Object getProxy(@Nullable ClassLoader classLoader) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Creating CGLIB proxy: " + this.advised.getTargetSource());
}
try {
//拿到目标对象类型
Class<?> rootClass = this.advised.getTargetClass();
Assert.state(rootClass != null, "Target class must be available for creating a CGLIB proxy");
//因为采用继承方式实现代理,这里拿到的是SuperClass,即目标类
Class<?> proxySuperClass = rootClass;
//如果目标类已经是cglib代理类了
if (rootClass.getName().contains(ClassUtils.CGLIB_CLASS_SEPARATOR)) {
//拿到当前cglib代理类的父类
proxySuperClass = rootClass.getSuperclass();
//还要拿到当前cglib代理类实现的接口
Class<?>[] additionalInterfaces = rootClass.getInterfaces();
for (Class<?> additionalInterface : additionalInterfaces) {
//将该代理类实现的接口,添加进代理类配置中,相当于增加了一下额外的接口,这些接口是下面要生成的代理类需要额外实现的
this.advised.addInterface(additionalInterface);
}
}
// Validate the class, writing log messages as necessary.
//对代理类进行一些校验---有参考性***
validateClassIfNecessary(proxySuperClass, classLoader);
// Configure CGLIB Enhancer...
//创建cglib增强器
Enhancer enhancer = createEnhancer();
if (classLoader != null) {
enhancer.setClassLoader(classLoader);
//检查当前类是否可以进行缓存
if (classLoader instanceof SmartClassLoader &&
((SmartClassLoader) classLoader).isClassReloadable(proxySuperClass)) {
enhancer.setUseCache(false);
}
}
//设置父类---即从代理配置中拿到的目标类
enhancer.setSuperclass(proxySuperClass);
//设置代理类需要实现的接口---completeProxiedInterfaces
//如果了解completeProxiedInterfaces方法实现的小伙伴应该知道,单个参数的completeProxiedInterfaces方法
//第二个参数decoratingProxy为false,表示代理类不会实现DecoratingProxy接口,只会额外实现Advised和SpringProxy接口
enhancer.setInterfaces(AopProxyUtils.completeProxiedInterfaces(this.advised));
enhancer.setNamingPolicy(SpringNamingPolicy.INSTANCE);
enhancer.setStrategy(new ClassLoaderAwareGeneratorStrategy(classLoader));
//获取到回调接口---这个方法很重要,因为这里拿到的回调接口就是拦截器链****
Callback[] callbacks = getCallbacks(rootClass);
//每个拦截器链的类型记录
Class<?>[] types = new Class<?>[callbacks.length];
for (int x = 0; x < types.length; x++) {
types[x] = callbacks[x].getClass();
}
// fixedInterceptorMap only populated at this point, after getCallbacks call above
enhancer.setCallbackFilter(
//CallbackFilte可以明确表明,被代理的类中不同的方法,被哪个拦截器所拦截
//通过返回一个下标表示,该下标对应callbacks数组中对应位置元素
new ProxyCallbackFilter(
this.advised.getConfigurationOnlyCopy(), this.fixedInterceptorMap, this.fixedInterceptorOffset));
enhancer.setCallbackTypes(types);
// Generate the proxy class and create a proxy instance.
//通过增强器和拦截器链,来创建具体的代理对象返回
return createProxyClassAndInstance(enhancer, callbacks);
}
catch (CodeGenerationException | IllegalArgumentException ex) {
throw new AopConfigException("Could not generate CGLIB subclass of " + this.advised.getTargetClass() +
": Common causes of this problem include using a final class or a non-visible class",
ex);
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
// TargetSource.getTarget() failed
throw new AopConfigException("Unexpected AOP exception", ex);
}
}
protected Object createProxyClassAndInstance(Enhancer enhancer, Callback[] callbacks) {
//设置是否拦截从代理的构造函数中调用的方法。默认值是true。拦截的方法将调用代理基类的方法(如果存在)。
//spring的处理,这里可以看出,如果在代理对象的构造函数中调用代理对象中某个方法,该方法是不糊被拦截的
enhancer.setInterceptDuringConstruction(false);
//设置回调接口
enhancer.setCallbacks(callbacks);
return (this.constructorArgs != null && this.constructorArgTypes != null ?
//如果存在构造函数,那么就走有参构造创建
enhancer.create(this.constructorArgTypes, this.constructorArgs) :
//否则走无参构造创建
enhancer.create());
}
/**
* Creates the CGLIB {@link Enhancer}. Subclasses may wish to override this to return a custom
* {@link Enhancer} implementation.
*/
protected Enhancer createEnhancer() {
return new Enhancer();
}
/**
* Checks to see whether the supplied Class has already been validated and
* validates it if not.
*/
private void validateClassIfNecessary(Class<?> proxySuperClass, @Nullable ClassLoader proxyClassLoader) {
if (logger.isWarnEnabled()) {
synchronized (validatedClasses) {
//当前目标对象类是否已经被校验过
if (!validatedClasses.containsKey(proxySuperClass)) {
//没有校验过,就进行校验,然后校验完毕后,加入缓存中
doValidateClass(proxySuperClass, proxyClassLoader,
ClassUtils.getAllInterfacesForClassAsSet(proxySuperClass));
validatedClasses.put(proxySuperClass, Boolean.TRUE);
}
}
}
}
/**
* Checks for final methods on the given {@code Class}, as well as package-visible
* methods across ClassLoaders, and writes warnings to the log for each one found.
* 主要是日志记录,对final和私有方法无法被代理,进行日志提醒
*/
private void doValidateClass(Class<?> proxySuperClass, @Nullable ClassLoader proxyClassLoader, Set<Class<?>> ifcs) {
//如果目标类是Object,就不进行校验了,说明
if (proxySuperClass != Object.class) {
//获取目标对象内部的所有方法,包括私有
Method[] methods = proxySuperClass.getDeclaredMethods();
for (Method method : methods) {
int mod = method.getModifiers();
if (!Modifier.isStatic(mod) && !Modifier.isPrivate(mod)) {
//进入这里说明当前方法是非静态和非私有的方法
if (Modifier.isFinal(mod)) {
//但是如果该方法是final方法,那么cglib无法对当前方法完成重写,然后实施拦截的操作
//这里只是日志提醒,但是不会抛出异常
if (logger.isInfoEnabled() && implementsInterface(method, ifcs)) {
logger.info("Unable to proxy interface-implementing method [" + method + "] because " +
"it is marked as final: Consider using interface-based JDK proxies instead!");
}
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Final method [" + method + "] cannot get proxied via CGLIB: " +
"Calls to this method will NOT be routed to the target instance and " +
"might lead to NPEs against uninitialized fields in the proxy instance.");
}
}
//如果当前方法是私有的,那么父类的私有方法对子类而言是不可见的,因此也无法完成重写,进而实施拦截操作
else if (logger.isDebugEnabled() && !Modifier.isPublic(mod) && !Modifier.isProtected(mod) &&
proxyClassLoader != null && proxySuperClass.getClassLoader() != proxyClassLoader) {
logger.debug("Method [" + method + "] is package-visible across different ClassLoaders " +
"and cannot get proxied via CGLIB: Declare this method as public or protected " +
"if you need to support invocations through the proxy.");
}
}
}
//如果当前目标对象还有父类,那么就对其父类进行递归校验,知道父类为底层Object为止
doValidateClass(proxySuperClass.getSuperclass(), proxyClassLoader, ifcs);
}
}
//返回拦截器链***比较重要
//讲解这个方法前,我们必须先明白一点,cglib可以向enchaner中加入不只一个callback
//然后可以通过callbackfilter来决定在方法被拦截后,先走到callbackfilter,通过其accept方法返回一个整数索引,来决定具体交给哪一个callback进行处理
private Callback[] getCallbacks(Class<?> rootClass) throws Exception {
// Parameters used for optimization choices...
//exposeProxy属性决定是否需要将当前对象暴露到AopContext中去
boolean exposeProxy = this.advised.isExposeProxy();
//是否需要冻结配置
boolean isFrozen = this.advised.isFrozen();
//是否每次TargetSource都返回相同类型的目标对象,默认为SingletonTargetSource,这里为true
boolean isStatic = this.advised.getTargetSource().isStatic();
// Choose an "aop" interceptor (used for AOP calls).
//通用 AOP 回调。当目标是动态的或代理未冻结时使用。---该类是当前类的内部类
Callback aopInterceptor = new DynamicAdvisedInterceptor(this.advised);
// Choose a "straight to target" interceptor. (used for calls that are
// unadvised but can return this). May be required to expose the proxy.
//targetInterceptor是直接会触发目标对象方法的拦截器,在某个方法没有关联的拦截器链时,会通过accpet方法,直接返回该拦截器在callback中的固定索引
Callback targetInterceptor;
if (exposeProxy) {
targetInterceptor = (
//默认为 SingletonTargetSource,为true
//isStatic为false的话,那么每次TargetSource每次会返回不同的target对象,因此只能往拦截器中放入targetSource,而非目标对象
//含有Exposed的字符串,说明该拦截器执行拦截的过程中,会将代理对象放入aopcontext中
//Static个dynamic的区别在于是否每次都需要重新从targetSource获取一次target
isStatic ?
//两个都是当前类的内部类,下面会讲到
new StaticUnadvisedExposedInterceptor(this.advised.getTargetSource().getTarget()) :
//DynamicUnadvisedExposedInterceptor不会将目标对象放入aopcontext中
new DynamicUnadvisedExposedInterceptor(this.advised.getTargetSource()));
}
else {
//不会将对象放入aopcontext中
targetInterceptor = (isStatic ?
new StaticUnadvisedInterceptor(this.advised.getTargetSource().getTarget()) :
new DynamicUnadvisedInterceptor(this.advised.getTargetSource()));
}
// Choose a "direct to target" dispatcher (used for
// unadvised calls to static targets that cannot return this).
//当目标方法是在advised上调用的时候,会返回该回调
Callback targetDispatcher = (
//isStatic为false的话,那么每次TargetSource每次会返回不同的target对象,因此只能往拦截器中放入targetSource,而非目标对象
isStatic ?
//保存target目标对象
new StaticDispatcher(this.advised.getTargetSource().getTarget()) :
//空实现
new SerializableNoOp());
//主要的回调接口集合--callback的索引很重要
Callback[] mainCallbacks = new Callback[] {
//主要的拦截器链
aopInterceptor, // for normal advice
//一般都是StaticUnadvisedExposedInterceptor
targetInterceptor, // invoke target without considering advice, if optimized
new SerializableNoOp(), // no override for methods mapped to this
//拿到目标对象和代理配置对象
targetDispatcher, this.advisedDispatcher,
//equals和hashcode拦截处理
new EqualsInterceptor(this.advised),
new HashCodeInterceptor(this.advised)
};
Callback[] callbacks;
// If the target is a static one and the advice chain is frozen,
// then we can make some optimizations by sending the AOP calls
// direct to the target using the fixed chain for that method.
//如果目标是静态的并且通知链被冻结,
//那么我们可以通过使用该方法的固定链将 AOP 调用直接发送到目标来进行一些优化。
if (isStatic && isFrozen) {
//拿到目标类中每个方法关联的拦截器链后,放入map集合,形成方法--->拦截器链的映射关系
Method[] methods = rootClass.getMethods();
Callback[] fixedCallbacks = new Callback[methods.length];
this.fixedInterceptorMap = CollectionUtils.newHashMap(methods.length);
// TODO: small memory optimization here (can skip creation for methods with no advice)
for (int x = 0; x < methods.length; x++) {
Method method = methods[x];
List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, rootClass);
fixedCallbacks[x] = new FixedChainStaticTargetInterceptor(
chain, this.advised.getTargetSource().getTarget(), this.advised.getTargetClass());
this.fixedInterceptorMap.put(method, x);
}
// Now copy both the callbacks from mainCallbacks
// and fixedCallbacks into the callbacks array.
//callbacks=mainCallbacks+fixedCallbacks
callbacks = new Callback[mainCallbacks.length + fixedCallbacks.length];
System.arraycopy(mainCallbacks, 0, callbacks, 0, mainCallbacks.length);
System.arraycopy(fixedCallbacks, 0, callbacks, mainCallbacks.length, fixedCallbacks.length);
this.fixedInterceptorOffset = mainCallbacks.length;
}
else {
callbacks = mainCallbacks;
}
return callbacks;
}
/**
对被代理方法执行后的返回值进行处理
*/
@Nullable
private static Object processReturnType(
Object proxy, @Nullable Object target, Method method, @Nullable Object returnValue) {
// Massage return value if necessary
if (returnValue != null && returnValue == target &&
!RawTargetAccess.class.isAssignableFrom(method.getDeclaringClass())) {
// Special case: it returned "this". Note that we can't help
// if the target sets a reference to itself in another returned object.
returnValue = proxy;
}
Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType();
if (returnValue == null && returnType != Void.TYPE && returnType.isPrimitive()) {
throw new AopInvocationException(
"Null return value from advice does not match primitive return type for: " + method);
}
return returnValue;
}
/**
* Method interceptor used for static targets with no advice chain. The call
* is passed directly back to the target. Used when the proxy needs to be
* exposed and it can't be determined that the method won't return
*/
private static class StaticUnadvisedInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, Serializable {
@Nullable
private final Object target;
public StaticUnadvisedInterceptor(@Nullable Object target) {
this.target = target;
}
@Override
@Nullable
public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
//直接调用目标方法
Object retVal = methodProxy.invoke(this.target, args);
//处理返回值
return processReturnType(proxy, this.target, method, retVal);
}
}
/**
* Method interceptor used for static targets with no advice chain, when the
* proxy is to be exposed.
*/
private static class StaticUnadvisedExposedInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, Serializable {
@Nullable
private final Object target;
public StaticUnadvisedExposedInterceptor(@Nullable Object target) {
this.target = target;
}
@Override
@Nullable
public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
//和上面相比,多了一步,将代理对象放入aopcontext中
Object oldProxy = null;
try {
oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
//目标方法执行
Object retVal = methodProxy.invoke(this.target, args);
return processReturnType(proxy, this.target, method, retVal);
}
finally {
AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy);
}
}
}
/**
* Interceptor used to invoke a dynamic target without creating a method
* invocation or evaluating an advice chain. (We know there was no advice
* for this method.)
*/
private static class DynamicUnadvisedInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, Serializable {
private final TargetSource targetSource;
public DynamicUnadvisedInterceptor(TargetSource targetSource) {
this.targetSource = targetSource;
}
@Override
@Nullable
public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
//Dynamic说明targetSource每次返回的target都是不同的,因此每次都需要去重新获取一遍target
Object target = this.targetSource.getTarget();
try {
Object retVal = methodProxy.invoke(target, args);
return processReturnType(proxy, target, method, retVal);
}
finally {
if (target != null) {
this.targetSource.releaseTarget(target);
}
}
}
}
/**
* Interceptor for unadvised dynamic targets when the proxy needs exposing.
*/
private static class DynamicUnadvisedExposedInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, Serializable {
private final TargetSource targetSource;
public DynamicUnadvisedExposedInterceptor(TargetSource targetSource) {
this.targetSource = targetSource;
}
@Override
@Nullable
public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
//代理放入aopcontext中
Object oldProxy = null;
Object target = this.targetSource.getTarget();
try {
oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
Object retVal = methodProxy.invoke(target, args);
return processReturnType(proxy, target, method, retVal);
}
finally {
AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy);
if (target != null) {
this.targetSource.releaseTarget(target);
}
}
}
}
/**
* Dispatcher for a static target. Dispatcher is much faster than
* interceptor. This will be used whenever it can be determined that a
* method definitely does not return "this"
*/
private static class StaticDispatcher implements Dispatcher, Serializable {
@Nullable
private final Object target;
public StaticDispatcher(@Nullable Object target) {
this.target = target;
}
@Override
@Nullable
public Object loadObject() {
return this.target;
}
}
/**
* Dispatcher for any methods declared on the Advised class.
*/
private static class AdvisedDispatcher implements Dispatcher, Serializable {
private final AdvisedSupport advised;
public AdvisedDispatcher(AdvisedSupport advised) {
this.advised = advised;
}
@Override
public Object loadObject() {
return this.advised;
}
}
/**
* Dispatcher for the {@code equals} method.
* Ensures that the method call is always handled by this class.
*/
private static class EqualsInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, Serializable {
private final AdvisedSupport advised;
public EqualsInterceptor(AdvisedSupport advised) {
this.advised = advised;
}
@Override
public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) {
Object other = args[0];
if (proxy == other) {
return true;
}
if (other instanceof Factory) {
Callback callback = ((Factory) other).getCallback(INVOKE_EQUALS);
if (!(callback instanceof EqualsInterceptor)) {
return false;
}
AdvisedSupport otherAdvised = ((EqualsInterceptor) callback).advised;
return AopProxyUtils.equalsInProxy(this.advised, otherAdvised);
}
else {
return false;
}
}
}
/**
* Dispatcher for the {@code hashCode} method.
* Ensures that the method call is always handled by this class.
*/
private static class HashCodeInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, Serializable {
private final AdvisedSupport advised;
public HashCodeInterceptor(AdvisedSupport advised) {
this.advised = advised;
}
@Override
public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) {
return CglibAopProxy.class.hashCode() * 13 + this.advised.getTargetSource().hashCode();
}
}
/**
* Interceptor used specifically for advised methods on a frozen, static proxy.
* 拦截器专门用于冻结的静态代理上的建议方法。
*/
private static class FixedChainStaticTargetInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, Serializable {
private final List<Object> adviceChain;
@Nullable
private final Object target;
@Nullable
private final Class<?> targetClass;
public FixedChainStaticTargetInterceptor(
List<Object> adviceChain, @Nullable Object target, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) {
this.adviceChain = adviceChain;
this.target = target;
this.targetClass = targetClass;
}
@Override
@Nullable
public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
//构造然后执行拦截器链
MethodInvocation invocation = new CglibMethodInvocation(
proxy, this.target, method, args, this.targetClass, this.adviceChain, methodProxy);
// If we get here, we need to create a MethodInvocation.
Object retVal = invocation.proceed();
retVal = processReturnType(proxy, this.target, method, retVal);
return retVal;
}
}
/**
* General purpose AOP callback. Used when the target is dynamic or when the
* proxy is not frozen.
* 重点拦截器:通用 AOP 回调。当目标是动态的或代理未冻结时使用。
*/
private static class DynamicAdvisedInterceptor implements MethodInterceptor, Serializable {
private final AdvisedSupport advised;
public DynamicAdvisedInterceptor(AdvisedSupport advised) {
this.advised = advised;
}
@Override
@Nullable
public Object intercept(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args, MethodProxy methodProxy) throws Throwable {
Object oldProxy = null;
boolean setProxyContext = false;
Object target = null;
TargetSource targetSource = this.advised.getTargetSource();
try {
//如果exposeProxy为true,那么就把代理对象放入aopcontext中
if (this.advised.exposeProxy) {
// Make invocation available if necessary.
oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy);
setProxyContext = true;
}
// Get as late as possible to minimize the time we "own" the target, in case it comes from a pool...
target = targetSource.getTarget();
Class<?> targetClass = (target != null ? target.getClass() : null);
//拿到当前方法关联的拦截器链
List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass);
Object retVal;
// Check whether we only have one InvokerInterceptor: that is,
// no real advice, but just reflective invocation of the target.
if (chain.isEmpty() && Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers())) {
// We can skip creating a MethodInvocation: just invoke the target directly.
// Note that the final invoker must be an InvokerInterceptor, so we know
// it does nothing but a reflective operation on the target, and no hot
// swapping or fancy proxying.
//如果拦截器链为空,那么直接执行目标方法
Object[] argsToUse = AopProxyUtils.adaptArgumentsIfNecessary(method, args);
retVal = methodProxy.invoke(target, argsToUse);
}
else {
//执行拦截器链
// We need to create a method invocation...
retVal = new CglibMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain, methodProxy).proceed();
}
retVal = processReturnType(proxy, target, method, retVal);
return retVal;
}
finally {
if (target != null && !targetSource.isStatic()) {
targetSource.releaseTarget(target);
}
if (setProxyContext) {
// Restore old proxy.
AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy);
}
}
}
@Override
public boolean equals(@Nullable Object other) {
return (this == other ||
(other instanceof DynamicAdvisedInterceptor &&
this.advised.equals(((DynamicAdvisedInterceptor) other).advised)));
}
/**
* CGLIB uses this to drive proxy creation.
*/
@Override
public int hashCode() {
return this.advised.hashCode();
}
}
/**
* Implementation of AOP Alliance MethodInvocation used by this AOP proxy.
*/
private static class CglibMethodInvocation extends ReflectiveMethodInvocation {
@Nullable
private final MethodProxy methodProxy;
public CglibMethodInvocation(Object proxy, @Nullable Object target, Method method,
Object[] arguments, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass,
List<Object> interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers, MethodProxy methodProxy) {
super(proxy, target, method, arguments, targetClass, interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers);
// Only use method proxy for public methods not derived from java.lang.Object
this.methodProxy = (Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers()) &&
method.getDeclaringClass() != Object.class && !AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method) &&
!AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method) && !AopUtils.isToStringMethod(method) ?
methodProxy : null);
}
@Override
@Nullable
public Object proceed() throws Throwable {
try {
//所有拦截器执行完毕后,执行invokeJoinpoint方法
return super.proceed();
}
catch (RuntimeException ex) {
throw ex;
}
catch (Exception ex) {
if (ReflectionUtils.declaresException(getMethod(), ex.getClass()) ||
KotlinDetector.isKotlinType(getMethod().getDeclaringClass())) {
// Propagate original exception if declared on the target method
// (with callers expecting it). Always propagate it for Kotlin code
// since checked exceptions do not have to be explicitly declared there.
throw ex;
}
else {
// Checked exception thrown in the interceptor but not declared on the
// target method signature -> apply an UndeclaredThrowableException,
// aligned with standard JDK dynamic proxy behavior.
throw new UndeclaredThrowableException(ex);
}
}
}
/**
* Gives a marginal performance improvement versus using reflection to
* invoke the target when invoking public methods.
*/
@Override
protected Object invokeJoinpoint() throws Throwable {
if (this.methodProxy != null) {
return this.methodProxy.invoke(this.target, this.arguments);
}
else {
return super.invokeJoinpoint();
}
}
}
/**
* CallbackFilter to assign Callbacks to methods.
*/
private static class ProxyCallbackFilter implements CallbackFilter {
private final AdvisedSupport advised;
private final Map<Method, Integer> fixedInterceptorMap;
private final int fixedInterceptorOffset;
public ProxyCallbackFilter(
AdvisedSupport advised, Map<Method, Integer> fixedInterceptorMap, int fixedInterceptorOffset) {
this.advised = advised;
this.fixedInterceptorMap = fixedInterceptorMap;
this.fixedInterceptorOffset = fixedInterceptorOffset;
}
//方法返回值可以决定当前方法教给callbacks数组中哪一个callback进行处理,该方法很重要
//但是该方法我不太想多讲,大家联系该类最开始给出的几个整型常量和getCallBack方法给出的mainCallBack中固定的callBack组合
//以及cglib的callBackFilter机制,相信下面这个方法
@Override
public int accept(Method method) {
if (AopUtils.isFinalizeMethod(method)) {
logger.trace("Found finalize() method - using NO_OVERRIDE");
return NO_OVERRIDE;
}
if (!this.advised.isOpaque() && method.getDeclaringClass().isInterface() &&
method.getDeclaringClass().isAssignableFrom(Advised.class)) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Method is declared on Advised interface: " + method);
}
return DISPATCH_ADVISED;
}
// We must always proxy equals, to direct calls to this.
if (AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Found 'equals' method: " + method);
}
return INVOKE_EQUALS;
}
// We must always calculate hashCode based on the proxy.
if (AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Found 'hashCode' method: " + method);
}
return INVOKE_HASHCODE;
}
Class<?> targetClass = this.advised.getTargetClass();
// Proxy is not yet available, but that shouldn't matter.
List<?> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass);
boolean haveAdvice = !chain.isEmpty();
boolean exposeProxy = this.advised.isExposeProxy();
boolean isStatic = this.advised.getTargetSource().isStatic();
boolean isFrozen = this.advised.isFrozen();
if (haveAdvice || !isFrozen) {
// If exposing the proxy, then AOP_PROXY must be used.
if (exposeProxy) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Must expose proxy on advised method: " + method);
}
return AOP_PROXY;
}
// Check to see if we have fixed interceptor to serve this method.
// Else use the AOP_PROXY.
if (isStatic && isFrozen && this.fixedInterceptorMap.containsKey(method)) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Method has advice and optimizations are enabled: " + method);
}
// We know that we are optimizing so we can use the FixedStaticChainInterceptors.
int index = this.fixedInterceptorMap.get(method);
return (index + this.fixedInterceptorOffset);
}
else {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Unable to apply any optimizations to advised method: " + method);
}
return AOP_PROXY;
}
}
else {
// See if the return type of the method is outside the class hierarchy of the target type.
// If so we know it never needs to have return type massage and can use a dispatcher.
// If the proxy is being exposed, then must use the interceptor the correct one is already
// configured. If the target is not static, then we cannot use a dispatcher because the
// target needs to be explicitly released after the invocation.
if (exposeProxy || !isStatic) {
return INVOKE_TARGET;
}
Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType();
if (targetClass != null && returnType.isAssignableFrom(targetClass)) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Method return type is assignable from target type and " +
"may therefore return 'this' - using INVOKE_TARGET: " + method);
}
return INVOKE_TARGET;
}
else {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Method return type ensures 'this' cannot be returned - " +
"using DISPATCH_TARGET: " + method);
}
return DISPATCH_TARGET;
}
}
}
....
}
}
CallBackFilter的accpet方法英文注释如下:
ObjenesisCglibAopProxy继承自CglibAopProxy,它只重写了createProxyClassAndInstance方法,createProxyClassAndInstancey是用来创建代理类的
CglibAopProxy中的createProxyClassAndInstance
protected Object createProxyClassAndInstance(Enhancer enhancer, Callback[] callbacks) {
enhancer.setInterceptDuringConstruction(false);
enhancer.setCallbacks(callbacks);
return (this.constructorArgs != null && this.constructorArgTypes != null ?
enhancer.create(this.constructorArgTypes, this.constructorArgs) :
enhancer.create());
}
ObjenesisCglibAopProxy中的createProxyClassAndInstance
class ObjenesisCglibAopProxy extends CglibAopProxy {
private static final Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(ObjenesisCglibAopProxy.class);
private static final SpringObjenesis objenesis = new SpringObjenesis();
/**
* Create a new ObjenesisCglibAopProxy for the given AOP configuration.
* @param config the AOP configuration as AdvisedSupport object
*/
public ObjenesisCglibAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) {
super(config);
}
@Override
protected Object createProxyClassAndInstance(Enhancer enhancer, Callback[] callbacks) {
Class<?> proxyClass = enhancer.createClass();
Object proxyInstance = null;
// 如果为true,那我们就采用objenesis去new一个实例~~~
if (objenesis.isWorthTrying()) {
try {
proxyInstance = objenesis.newInstance(proxyClass, enhancer.getUseCache());
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
logger.debug("Unable to instantiate proxy using Objenesis, " +
"falling back to regular proxy construction", ex);
}
}
// 若果还为null,就再去拿到构造函数(指定参数的)
if (proxyInstance == null) {
// Regular instantiation via default constructor...
try {
Constructor<?> ctor = (this.constructorArgs != null ?
proxyClass.getDeclaredConstructor(this.constructorArgTypes) :
proxyClass.getDeclaredConstructor());
ReflectionUtils.makeAccessible(ctor);
proxyInstance = (this.constructorArgs != null ?
ctor.newInstance(this.constructorArgs) : ctor.newInstance());
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
throw new AopConfigException("Unable to instantiate proxy using Objenesis, " +
"and regular proxy instantiation via default constructor fails as well", ex);
}
}
((Factory) proxyInstance).setCallbacks(callbacks);
return proxyInstance;
}
}
Objenesis下面会讲,这里先不着急,一会我讲完Objenesis后,大家再回头看一下这个方法
它专门用来创建对象,即使你没有空的构造函数,都木有问题~~ 可谓非常的强大
它不使用构造方法创建Java对象,所以即使你有空的构造方法,也是不会执行的。
Objenesis是一个Java的库,主要用来创建特定的对象。
由于不是所有的类都有无参构造器又或者类构造器是private,在这样的情况下,如果我们还想实例化对象,class.newInstance是无法满足的。
public class MainTest {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Objenesis objenesis = new ObjenesisStd();
// 它竟然创建成功了
MyDemo myDemo = objenesis.newInstance(MyDemo.class);
System.out.println(myDemo); //com.fsx.maintest.MyDemo@1f32e575
System.out.println(myDemo.code); //null 特别注意:这里是null,而不是10
// 若直接这样创建 就报错 java.lang.InstantiationException: com.fsx.maintest.MyDemo
System.out.println(MyDemo.class.newInstance());
}
}
class MyDemo {
public String code = "10";
public MyDemo(String code) {
this.code = code;
}
}
使用ObjectInstantiator
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Objenesis objenesis = new ObjenesisStd();
// 相当于生成了一个实例创建的工厂,接下来就可以很方便得创建实例了
// 如果你要创建多个实例,建议这么来创建
ObjectInstantiator<MyDemo> instantiator = objenesis.getInstantiatorOf(MyDemo.class);
MyDemo myDemo1 = instantiator.newInstance();
MyDemo myDemo2 = instantiator.newInstance();
System.out.println(myDemo1);
System.out.println(myDemo1.code); //null
System.out.println(myDemo2);
}
这是Spring对Objenesis接口的一个实现。由Spring4.2之后提供的(ObjenesisCglibAopProxy可是Spring4.0就有了哦)
基本使用上,我们只需要换个实现就成:
Objenesis objenesis = new SpringObjenesis();
Spring为我们提供了一个isWorthTrying()方法:
// 是否需要尝试:也就是说,它是否还没有被使用过,或者已知是否有效。方法返回true,表示值得尝试
// 如果配置的Objenesis Instantiator策略被确定为不处理当前JVM。或者系统属性"spring.objenesis.ignore"值设置为true,表示不尝试了
// 这个在ObjenesisCglibAopProxy创建代理实例的时候用到了。若不尝试使用Objenesis,那就还是用老的方式用空构造函数吧
public boolean isWorthTrying() {
return (this.worthTrying != Boolean.FALSE);
}
从以上代码可以发现class构造器需要参数,而Objenesis可以绕过去, Objenesis主要应用场景:
也是位于cglib相关的包内。org.springframework.cglib.proxy
CGLIB是一个强大的高性能的代码生成包。它被许多AOP的框架(例如Spring AOP)使用,为他们提供方法的interception(拦截)
CGLIB包的底层是通过使用一个小而快的字节码处理框架ASM,来转换字节码并生成新的类。不鼓励直接使用ASM,因为它要求你必须对JVM内部结构包括class文件的格式和指令集都很熟悉
public class MainTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Enhancer enhancer = new Enhancer();
enhancer.setSuperclass(MyDemo.class);
// 注意此处得MethodInterceptor是cglib包下的 AOP联盟里还有一个MethodInterceptor
enhancer.setCallback((MethodInterceptor) (o, method, args1, methodProxy) -> {
System.out.println(method.getName() + "---方法拦截前");
// 此处千万不能调用method得invoke方法,否则会死循环的 只能使用methodProxy.invokeSuper 进行调用
//Object result = method.invoke(o, args1);
Object result = methodProxy.invokeSuper(o, args1);
System.out.println(method.getName() + "---方法拦截后");
return result;
});
//MyDemo myDemo = (MyDemo) enhancer.create(); // 这里是要求必须有空的构造函数的
MyDemo myDemo = (MyDemo) enhancer.create(new Class[]{String.class}, new Object[]{"fsx"});
// 直接打印:默认会调用toString方法以及hashCode方法 此处都被拦截了
System.out.println(myDemo);
//System.out.println(myDemo.code);
}
}
class MyDemo {
public String code = "10";
public MyDemo(String code) {
this.code = code;
}
}
输出:
toString---方法拦截前
hashCode---方法拦截前
hashCode---方法拦截后
toString---方法拦截后
com.fsx.maintest.MyDemo$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$b07b3819@7960847b
fsx
这样我们就简单的实现了,对一个对象进行增强。
还有一种创建代理实例的方式,就是我们只用Enhancer把Class类型创建出来,然后创建实例的工作交给Objenesis 这样我们就拜托了对构造函数的依赖
public static void main(String[] args) {
Enhancer enhancer = new Enhancer();
enhancer.setSuperclass(MyDemo.class);
// 如国实用createClass方式来创建代理的实例 是不能直接添加callback得
//enhancer.setCallback();
enhancer.setNamingPolicy(SpringNamingPolicy.INSTANCE);
enhancer.setStrategy(new DefaultGeneratorStrategy());
enhancer.setCallbackFilter(new CallbackHelper(MyDemo.class, null) {
@Override
protected Object getCallback(Method method) {
return (MethodInterceptor) (o, method1, args1, methodProxy) -> {
System.out.println(method1.getName() + "---方法拦截前");
// 此处千万不能调用method得invoke方法,否则会死循环的 只能使用methodProxy.invokeSuper 进行调用
//Object result = method.invoke(o, args1);
Object result = methodProxy.invokeSuper(o, args1);
System.out.println(method1.getName() + "---方法拦截后");
return result;
};
}
});
enhancer.setCallbackTypes(new Class[]{MethodInterceptor.class});
// 这里我们只生成Class字节码,并不去创建对象
Class clazz = enhancer.createClass();
// 创建对象的操作交给
Objenesis objenesis = new SpringObjenesis();
MyDemo myDemo = (MyDemo) objenesis.newInstance(clazz);
System.out.println(myDemo);
System.out.println(myDemo.code);
}
输出:
com.fsx.maintest.MyDemo$$EnhancerBySpringCGLIB$$6558edaa@5700d6b1
null
这样即使你没有空的构造函数,我依然可议给你创建一个实例。
生成二进制Class的方法
针对不同场景, CGlib准备了不同的Class生成方法
二进制文件存在在哪儿?
放在byte数组中,下面这行代码就截取于方法AbstractClassGenerator.create(Object key)
byte[] b = strategy.generate(this);
然后通过 ReflectUtils.defineClass(className, b, loader)生成对应的Class实例,并缓存入cache2
Cglib如何把二进制Load生成的Class
上面说了,事ReflectUtils.defineClass这个方法:
public static Class defineClass(String className, byte[] b, ClassLoader loader) throws Exception {
return defineClass(className, b, loader, PROTECTION_DOMAIN);
}
public static Class defineClass(String className, byte[] b, ClassLoader loader, ProtectionDomain protectionDomain) throws Exception {
Object[] args;
Class c;
if (DEFINE_CLASS != null) {
args = new Object[]{className, b, new Integer(0), new Integer(b.length), protectionDomain};
c = (Class)DEFINE_CLASS.invoke(loader, args);
} else {
if (DEFINE_CLASS_UNSAFE == null) {
throw new CodeGenerationException(THROWABLE);
}
args = new Object[]{className, b, new Integer(0), new Integer(b.length), loader, protectionDomain};
c = (Class)DEFINE_CLASS_UNSAFE.invoke(UNSAFE, args);
}
Class.forName(className, true, loader);
return c;
}
JDK代理只能针对实现了接口的类以反射的方式生成代理,而不能针对类 ,所以也叫接口代理。
CGLIB是针对类实现代理的,主要对指定的类以字节码转换的方式(ASM框架)生成一个子类,并重写其中的方法。
所以使用CGLIB做动态代理,必须要保证有一个空的构造函数。(那是之前,其实现在不需要了,因为我们有了Objenesis的帮助),但是类不能是Final的
版权说明 : 本文为转载文章, 版权归原作者所有 版权申明
原文链接 : https://cjdhy.blog.csdn.net/article/details/124370023
内容来源于网络,如有侵权,请联系作者删除!