我有这个查询，需要很长时间（大约10分钟）才能完成。
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT(column)) var,
column2 var2
FROM table
WHERE column<>'X' and
column2 between 'Y' and 'Z'
GROUP BY var2
ORDER BY var DESC有没有办法优化速度？我尝试了索引，但仍然很慢。可能是设置不正确。y和z是时间戳，如果有关系的话，x是这个查询根本不需要的东西，但是它在表中，因为它是来自同一个应用程序的其他查询所需要的。这个表非常大，有数百万行，而且还没有增长。
编辑：下面是一个示例的解释结果：
mysql> EXPLAIN SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT(ip)) v, geo n from idevaff_iptracking where geo<>'XX' and stamp between '1525122000' and '1543615199' group by n order by v desc;
+------+-------------+--------------------+-------+------------------------+--------------+---------+------+---------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+------+-------------+--------------------+-------+------------------------+--------------+---------+------+---------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | idevaff_iptracking | range | stamp,geo,geo_stamp_ip | geo_stamp_ip | 9 | NULL | 3469323 | Using where; Using index; Using temporary; Using filesort |
+------+-------------+--------------------+-------+------------------------+--------------+---------+------+---------+-----------------------------------------------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)下表所示为：
id，acct\u id，ip，refer，stamp，hit\u time，hit\u date，src1，src2，split，sub\u id，tid1，tid2，tid3，tid4，target\u url，geo。
指标如下：
mysql> SHOW INDEX FROM idevaff_iptracking
-> ;
+--------------------+------------+--------------------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
| Table | Non_unique | Key_name | Seq_in_index | Column_name | Collation | Cardinality | Sub_part | Packed | Null | Index_type | Comment | Index_comment |
+--------------------+------------+--------------------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
| idevaff_iptracking | 0 | PRIMARY | 1 | id | A | 6775984 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_ip | 1 | acct_id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_ip | 2 | ip | A | 6775984 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | ip | 1 | ip | A | 6775984 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | stamp | 1 | stamp | A | 6775984 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id | 1 | acct_id | A | 4 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | geo | 1 | geo | A | 440 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | tid1 | 1 | tid1 | A | 276 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | tid2 | 1 | tid2 | A | 514 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | tid3 | 1 | tid3 | A | 34 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | tid4 | 1 | tid4 | A | 5623 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_stamp_ip | 1 | acct_id | A | 744 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_stamp_ip | 2 | stamp | A | 6775984 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_stamp_ip | 3 | ip | A | 6775984 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | geo_stamp_ip | 1 | geo | A | 22362 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | geo_stamp_ip | 2 | stamp | A | 6775984 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | geo_stamp_ip | 3 | ip | A | 6775984 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_tid1_stamp | 1 | acct_id | A | 658 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_tid1_stamp | 2 | tid1 | A | 11866 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_tid1_stamp | 3 | stamp | A | 6775984 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_tid2_stamp | 1 | acct_id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_tid2_stamp | 2 | tid2 | A | 18666 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_tid2_stamp | 3 | stamp | A | 6775984 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_tid3_stamp | 1 | acct_id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_tid3_stamp | 2 | tid3 | A | 1832 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_tid3_stamp | 3 | stamp | A | 6775984 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_tid4_stamp | 1 | acct_id | A | 2 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_tid4_stamp | 2 | tid4 | A | 5060 | NULL | NULL | YES | BTREE | | |
| idevaff_iptracking | 1 | acct_id_tid4_stamp | 3 | stamp | A | 6775984 | NULL | NULL | | BTREE | | |
+--------------------+------------+--------------------+--------------+-------------+-----------+-------------+----------+--------+------+------------+---------+---------------+
29 rows in set (0.00 sec)
1条答案
按热度按时间bn31dyow1#
添加此综合指数：
如果这还不够，我们需要看看
SHOW CREATE TABLE以便进一步讨论(geo_stamp_ip没有那么好。）通常情况下，将数组（数组）展开是错误的
tid's)跨列。有些索引是多余的。一般来说，
INDEX(a)可以删除，如果你有INDEX(a,b). (例如：acct_id_ip)