我正在ApacheFlinkSQLAPI中构建一个管道。管道执行简单的投影查询。但是，我需要在查询之前编写一次元组（确切地说是每个元组中的一些元素），在查询之后再编写一次。事实证明，我用来编写redis的代码严重降低了性能。i、 Flink以很小的数据速率产生反压力。我的代码有什么问题以及如何改进。有什么建议吗。
当我停止给redis写信时，前后的表现都非常出色。这是我的管道代码：

public class QueryExample {
    public static Long throughputCounterAfter=new Long("0");
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int k_partitions = 10;
        reamExecutionEnvironment env = StreamExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment();
        env.setStreamTimeCharacteristic(TimeCharacteristic.EventTime);
        env.setParallelism(5 * 32);
        Properties props = new Properties();
        props.setProperty("zookeeper.connect", "zookeeper-node-01:2181");
        props.setProperty("bootstrap.servers", "kafka-node-01:9092,kafka-node-02:9092,kafka-node-03:9092");
        // not to be shared with another job consuming the same topic
        props.setProperty("group.id", "flink-group");
        props.setProperty("enable.auto.commit","false");
        FlinkKafkaConsumer011<String> purchasesConsumer=new FlinkKafkaConsumer011<String>("purchases",
                new SimpleStringSchema(),
                props);

        DataStream<String> purchasesStream = env
                .addSource(purchasesConsumer)
                .setParallelism(Math.min(5 * 32, k_partitions));
        DataStream<Tuple4<Integer, Integer, Integer, Long>> purchaseWithTimestampsAndWatermarks =
                purchasesStream
                        .flatMap(new PurchasesParser())
                        .assignTimestampsAndWatermarks(new BoundedOutOfOrdernessTimestampExtractor<Tuple4<Integer, Integer, Integer, Long>>(Time.seconds(10)) {

                            @Override
                            public long extractTimestamp(Tuple4<Integer, Integer, Integer, Long> element) {
                                return element.getField(3);
                            }
                        });

        Table purchasesTable = tEnv.fromDataStream(purchaseWithTimestampsAndWatermarks, "userID, gemPackID,price, rowtime.rowtime");
        tEnv.registerTable("purchasesTable", purchasesTable);

        purchaseWithTimestampsAndWatermarks.flatMap(new WriteToRedis());
        Table result = tEnv.sqlQuery("SELECT  userID, gemPackID, rowtime from purchasesTable");
        DataStream<Tuple2<Boolean, Row>> queryResultAsDataStream = tEnv.toRetractStream(result, Row.class);
        queryResultAsDataStream.flatMap(new WriteToRedis());
        try {
            env.execute("flink SQL");

        } catch (Exception e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    }

/**
 * write to redis
 */
public static class WriteToRedis extends RichFlatMapFunction<Tuple4<Integer, Integer, Integer, Long>, String> {
    RedisReadAndWrite redisReadAndWrite;

    @Override
    public void open(Configuration parameters) {
        LOG.info("Opening connection with Jedis to {}", "redis");
        this.redisReadAndWrite = new RedisReadAndWrite("redis",6379);

    }

    @Override
    public void flatMap(Tuple4<Integer, Integer, Integer, Long> input, Collector<String> out) throws Exception {
        this.redisReadAndWrite.write(input.f0+":"+input.f3+"","time_seen", TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(System.nanoTime())+"");
    }
}
}

public class RedisReadAndWrite {
    private Jedis flush_jedis;

    public RedisReadAndWrite(String redisServerName , int port) {
        flush_jedis=new Jedis(redisServerName,port);
    }

    public void write(String key,String field, String value) {
        flush_jedis.hset(key,field,value);

    }
}

附加部分：我尝试了第二个实现，即使用jedis批量编写toredis的process函数。然而，我得到以下错误。org.apache.flink.runtime.client.jobexecutionexception:redis.clients.jedis.exceptions.jedisconnectionexception:java.net.socketexception:套接字未连接。我试图使成批消息的数量更小，但过了一段时间后仍然出现错误。
以下是流程功能的实现：
/**使用进程函数写入redis/

public static class WriteToRedisAfterQueryProcessFn extends ProcessFunction<Tuple2<Boolean, Row>, String> {
    Long timetoFlush;
    @Override
    public void open(Configuration parameters) {
        flush_jedis=new Jedis("redis",6379,1800);
        p = flush_jedis.pipelined();
        this.timetoFlush=System.currentTimeMillis()-initialTime;
    }

    @Override
    public void processElement(Tuple2<Boolean, Row> input, Context context, Collector<String> collector) throws Exception {
        p.hset(input.f1.getField(0)+":"+new Instant(input.f1.getField(2)).getMillis()+"","time_updated",TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS.toMillis(System.nanoTime())+"");
        throughputAccomulationcount++;
        System.out.println(throughputAccomulationcount);
        if(throughputAccomulationcount==50000){
            throughputAccomulationcount=0L;
            p.sync();
        }
    }
}