Spring MVC 序列的增量大小在实体Map中设置为[50],而关联的数据库序列增量大小为[1]

pcww981p  于 2022-11-14  发布在  Spring
关注(0)|答案(4)|浏览(191)

我正在udemy上学习Spring 5等,我在测试我们的应用程序的部分。到现在为止一切都很好,我能够连接到PostgreSQL数据库,但现在我被困在这个测试失败,因为2天。
我不明白是什么导致测试失败。应用程序运行,但测试没有。下面是测试类:

package com.ghevi.dao;

import com.ghevi.pma.ProjectManagementApplication;
import com.ghevi.pma.dao.ProjectRepository;
import com.ghevi.pma.entities.Project;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.boot.test.autoconfigure.orm.jpa.DataJpaTest;
import org.springframework.test.context.ContextConfiguration;
import org.springframework.test.context.jdbc.Sql;
import org.springframework.test.context.jdbc.SqlGroup;
import org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringRunner;

import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;

@ContextConfiguration(classes= ProjectManagementApplication.class)
@RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
@DataJpaTest // for temporary databases like h2
@SqlGroup({
        @Sql(executionPhase = Sql.ExecutionPhase.BEFORE_TEST_METHOD, scripts = {"classpath:schema.sql", "classpath:data.sql"}),
        @Sql(executionPhase = Sql.ExecutionPhase.AFTER_TEST_METHOD, scripts = "classpath:drop.sql")
})
public class ProjectRepositoryIntegrationTest {

    @Autowired
    ProjectRepository proRepo;

    @Test
    public void ifNewProjectSaved_thenSuccess(){
        Project newProject = new Project("New Test Project", "COMPLETE", "Test description");
        proRepo.save(newProject);

        assertEquals(5, proRepo.findAll().size());
    }

}

下面是堆栈跟踪:
https://pastebin.com/WcjNU76p
员工类(不要介意这些评论,它们可能是垃圾):

package com.ghevi.pma.entities;

import javax.persistence.*;
import java.util.List;

@Entity
public class Employee {

    @Id
    @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "employee_seq") // AUTO for data insertion in the class projmanagapplication (the commented out part), IDENTITY let hibernate use the database id counter.
    private long employeeId;                            // The downside of IDENTITY is that if we batch a lot of employees or projects it will be much slower to update them, we use SEQUENCE now that we have schema.sql (spring does batch update)

    private String firstName;
    private String lastName;
    private String email;

    // @ManyToOne many employees can be assigned to one project
    // Cascade, the query done on projects it's also done on children entities
    @ManyToMany(cascade = {CascadeType.DETACH, CascadeType.MERGE, CascadeType.REFRESH, CascadeType.PERSIST}, // Standard in the industry, dont use the REMOVE (if delete project delete also children) or ALL (because include REMOVE)
               fetch = FetchType.LAZY)  // LAZY is industry standard it loads project into memory, EAGER load also associated entities so it slows the app, so we use LAZY and call child entities later
    //@JoinColumn(name="project_id")  // Foreign key, creates a new table on Employee database
    @JoinTable(name = "project_employee",  // Merge the two table using two foreign keys
               joinColumns = @JoinColumn(name="employee_id"),
               inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(name="project_id"))

    private List<Project> projects;

    public Employee(){

    }

    public Employee(String firstName, String lastName, String email) {
        this.firstName = firstName;
        this.lastName = lastName;
        this.email = email;
    }

    public List<Project> getProjects() {
        return projects;
    }

    public void setProjects(List<Project> projects) {
        this.projects = projects;
    }

    /* Replaced with List<Project>
    public Project getProject() {
        return project;
    }

    public void setProject(Project project) {
        this.project = project;
    }
    */

    public long getEmployeeId() {
        return employeeId;
    }

    public void setEmployeeId(long employeeId) {
        this.employeeId = employeeId;
    }

    public String getFirstName() {
        return firstName;
    }

    public void setFirstName(String firstName) {
        this.firstName = firstName;
    }

    public String getLastName() {
        return lastName;
    }

    public void setLastName(String lastName) {
        this.lastName = lastName;
    }

    public String getEmail() {
        return email;
    }

    public void setEmail(String email) {
        this.email = email;
    }
}

这也是schema.sql,我在这里引用了这些序列,因为这个文件是由测试运行的,我刚刚注意到IntelliJ在这个文件中标记了一些错误。例如,它将一些空格和TABLE的T标记为红色,说:
第一次

tyu7yeag

tyu7yeag1#

你永远不会告诉它序列,只是发生器叫什么
尝试

@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE, generator = "employee_generator")
@SequenceGenerator(name = "employee_generator", sequenceName = "employee_seq", allocationSize = 1)
stszievb

stszievb2#

我遇到了同样的问题。添加下面的注解解决了这个问题。@SequenceGenerator(name = "employee_seq", allocationSize = 1)

wgeznvg7

wgeznvg73#

可能是employee实体中的生成器定义有问题。“generator”必须是SequenceGenerator的“name”,而不是序列等其他内容的名称。可能是因为您提供了序列的名称,并且没有具有该名称的生成器,所以它使用了默认的预分配,即50。
此外,策略应为SEQUENCE,但如果定义了生成器,则不需要该策略,仅当未定义生成器时,该策略才相关。

jfgube3f

jfgube3f4#

默认情况下,SequenceGenerator中的allocationSize参数设置为50。当序列增量不匹配时会出现此问题。您可以根据需要更改序列增量值或分配allocationSize大小。

相关问题