当在Mac OSX上运行simplecov
时,所产生的覆盖率几乎没有意义。
如果运行以下测试:
rails test test/models/channel_test.rb
> 4 runs, 4 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips
> Coverage report generated for Minitest to /Volumes/[...]/coverage. 0 / 0 LOC (100.0%) covered.
然而,当运行rails test test/models
时,图形输出指示test/models/channel_test.rb
require "test_helper"
class ChannelTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
test "invalid if name not defined" do
channel = Channel.new(priority: 1, unit_cost: 1, daily_limit: 9999)
assert_not channel.valid?
assert_not channel.save, "Saved the channel without a name"
end
更新我推测可能是测试所选的语法存在缺陷-我添加了补充测试,结果仍然报告
型号3 relevant lines. 0 lines covered and 3 lines missed.
class Channel < ApplicationRecord # red
validates :name, presence: true # red
end # red
因此,测试通过,但覆盖率结果令人困惑:
a)作为独立测试,覆盖率计数为0/0
,而测试通过
B)什么构成miss
或相反coverage
由a(the?)测试?
test_helper.rb
require 'simplecov'
SimpleCov.start
ENV['RAILS_ENV'] ||= 'test'
require_relative "../config/environment"
require "rails/test_help"
require 'webmock/minitest'
class ActiveSupport::TestCase
parallelize(workers: :number_of_processors)
fixtures :all
def log_in_as(user, shop)
post user_session_url, params: { user_id: user.id, active_shop_id: @site.shop_id }
end
end
更新2根据@BroiSatse的建议,注解掉parallelize(workers: :number_of_processors)
允许测量覆盖率。
1条答案
按热度按时间nnsrf1az1#
谢谢,这个问题也是我的问题。所有的信贷BroiSatse的评论。
我在test_helper.rb中添加了以下代码行,它保持了并行测试的速度优势,而不是简单地注解掉这一行。它基于BroiSatse评论的链接:
在此之后,SimpleCov报告的测试覆盖率从3.8%“提高”到90%以上。